Is your life defined by fighting to be part of a club that isn't worth joining?

Just saw this in the quote of the day thread and was hoping Bullseye could expand on their comment a bit more?

If it was... I'd be in Zamfucka right now.


My life is defined by how I live and how I accept myself... I really don't give a fuck if I am accepted by people or not.

I do think there is a majority in SC that really need to find a life outside of SC... and ironically enough it is those that claim they do have a life outside of SC.

Members like farmers and embroider, and her bloody dead mother, are the most pathetic of them all but there are others.

For farmers it's a case of "look at me, pity me, like me...please?"

embroider just has a weird obsession with a woman who is dead... and needs to get over it and find a new hobby... like chasing tyres or something.

marks brings it all on herself by telling people how to be people... that's all it really boils down to.

LIFE IS LIFE

bullseye wrote:

Alright, she's a twit. But the forum today looks like a high school playground. Those more intelligent people should be able to see that and just how juvenile they look.

I rarely see internet forums as a place for srs bznz. I'll be an asshole to people online in ways I won't be offline because it's anonymous, meaningless and often hilarious. Sure, there may be another person on the other end, but I don't know them and their feelings don't mean anything to me, but if they get wound up by shit I say online that's their defect, because I take very little online seriously.

(Chrome, stop trying to tell me that "online" and "offline" aren't words)

Cowardice? No, I don't think so... there are just different social conventions in an online community. Would I engage the retard in conversation in normal life and act the same way? No, I wouldn't... I would likely let that awkward silence fall... you know, that one that tells everybody that someone has just embarrassed themselves? Yeah, well you can't do that online so I tell it straight.

Yes, she can say what she wants, she can tell people how to be people if she wishes... but she genuinely interferes in people's business by narking. She imposes her own moral code on people where she has no right to.

Reminds me of surfgirl... when I told everyone that I had converted to Islam, she started posting hateful, vile things about Muslims and used Fabian tactics in debate. No purpose to that recollection, I just hate the bitch.

I can honestly say that retarded comments I make on SC are the same as the ones I make in real life - hopefully, in both cases, people recognise that I am being retarded for humour value, rather than it being my honest opinion. On rare occasions, humour and honesty meet

Some people deserve to be treated with disdain - narks is a classic example! Bigoted twats don't deserve fake pats on the back or props. Fuck'em!

bullseye wrote:

Ok, there are differing social conventions online. Why, though? Who decided that?

In my case, I decided that. I don't see reality as analogous to cyberspace so why should I treat them the same?

Although, I have to admit I have no idea what a Fabian tactic is.

[/quote]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_strategy

bullseye wrote:Why not just ignore them, Donkeycheese? If they're not worth your respect, why give them your attention at all?

I don't always get your humour, but I like your honesty.

interesting point

for me, whether they are worthy of my respect or not, has no impact on whether I give them any attention. if I have time, I will call a twat a twat

if I don't have time, I sometimes forget to tell those whom I love that I love them





PS - I love you guys (You guys, are my best friends, through thick and thin, we'll always be together)

To answer the original question, No, my life is not defined by fighting to be part of a club that isn't worth joining.

I do agree with what bullseye is saying though. I guess it boils down to what road you prefer to take when it comes to your communications with others on the internet ~ the high road, or the low road.

I think in regards to Markslovenz that she perhaps in RL isn't as popular as she would like, I do get a bit gobsmacked at how often she narks on others , narking has always been something I find dishonourable both in RL and on the internet.
Furthermore in regards to SC there are many many threads she could post in that would give her her fix and yet not stress her out as much.
So in a way she is quite controlling as she knows that the people that she reports are highly unlikely to do the same to her.....at this point I really think she needs to be banned, it would mean that she could still see threads but not respond and I think this could be educational for her, A kinda step back,look at the bigger picture if you will.

On a COMPLETLY different note! Anjewel unleashing her darker side was fanfuckingtastic reading! I think it's those little nuggets of prose that keep some of us logging in as often as we do.

In all honesty, I don't believe Marks got anywhere near a hospital over Easter...It was just a cop out and an attention seeking attempt, hoping that everyone would let her be so she never had to apologise to Frup, or admit that she was way out of line...In the words of the Thompson Twins..."Lies lies lies yeah, they wont forget you..."...Hence why I couldn't and can't give a shit...

A post of mine that was deleted is now returned... what manner of witchcraft is this?

Anjewel wrote:In all honesty, I don't believe Marks got anywhere near a hospital over Easter...It was just a cop out and an attention seeking attempt, hoping that everyone would let her be so she never had to apologise to Frup, or admit that she was way out of line...In the words of the Thompson Twins..."Lies lies lies yeah, they wont forget you..."...Hence why I couldn't and can't give a shit...

Anjewel - I love you more!! I was a fan of the Thompson Twins as a kid (east is east, west is west)

I listened again recently - fuck they're quite shit!!! Anyway, Tom's current thing is International Observer - quite interesting~!!!

bullseye wrote:
She did admit she was out of line and apologise.

Right here

Have you read the whole post? Because it didn't look like an apology at all. Even though the words 'I apologise' have been used, the context suggested otherwise - that she was not apologetic at all and that she was actually doing us all a service by doing the job the SC moderators were supposed to. do.
So no, I don't buy into your opinion that she has apologised and that we should believe her attention-seeking crap.

Donkeycheese wrote:

Anjewel wrote:In all honesty, I don't believe Marks got anywhere near a hospital over Easter...It was just a cop out and an attention seeking attempt, hoping that everyone would let her be so she never had to apologise to Frup, or admit that she was way out of line...In the words of the Thompson Twins..."Lies lies lies yeah, they wont forget you..."...Hence why I couldn't and can't give a shit...

Anjewel - I love you more!! I was a fan of the Thompson Twins as a kid (east is east, west is west)

I listened again recently - fuck they're quite shit!!! Anyway, Tom's current thing is International Observer - quite interesting~!!!

Yep quite shit alright...I watched that doco on her and how she fell in love with some other guy and up and left with the new guy and now makes chairs/couches using out of it stuff...

And yes what Canterella said, definitely not an apology at all...Sorry Bullseye, not seeing what you see..

bullseye wrote:

Anjewel wrote:And yes what Canterella said, definitely not an apology at all...Sorry Bullseye, not seeing what you see..

You're not looking for one. Seriously, IMHO you just want another excuse to have a go and, no matter what she posts, that's what you're going to see.
I wonder what frup thought of it.

Really..?..Seriously IMHO, are you Marks...?

bullseye wrote:

Anjewel wrote:And yes what Canterella said, definitely not an apology at all...Sorry Bullseye, not seeing what you see..

You're not looking for one. Seriously, IMHO you just want another excuse to have a go and, no matter what she posts, that's what you're going to see, something to have a go at.
I wonder what frup thought of it.

You forget that most people here have seen Marks do this for over 6 odd years now. You seem to base your judgements of other's poor behaviour on one or two interactions, rather than 6 years worth of bullshit.

Anjewel wrote:

bullseye wrote:

Anjewel wrote:And yes what Canterella said, definitely not an apology at all...Sorry Bullseye, not seeing what you see..

You're not looking for one. Seriously, IMHO you just want another excuse to have a go and, no matter what she posts, that's what you're going to see.
I wonder what frup thought of it.

Really..?..Seriously IMHO, are you Marks...?

I guess she is indeed Marks.

What did I think of what?

frup wrote:What did I think of what?

When bullseye Narks apologised to you at SC..

Do we really need to drag this kind of shit here?

Psalter wrote:Do we really need to drag this kind of shit here?

Agreed, it's tedious and uninteresting.

____ wrote:

Psalter wrote:Do we really need to drag this kind of shit here?

Agreed, it's tedious and uninteresting.

This.