I've noticed a couple of ghost bumps in her threads.
I'm curious there seems to be mention of 'what happened last time', can someone fill me in?
I'm curious there seems to be mention of 'what happened last time', can someone fill me in?
Broadly speaking, there are two start points to self-improvement; self-reflection, and constructive criticism. Unfortunately, constructive criticism relies on reflection for it to work.
Self-reflection is a deliberate act that sees a person examine their actions for strengths and weaknesses; once identified the person may take action to improve on their strengths, and eliminate their weaknesses (to some degree). If a person is inadequately equipped to examine their strengths and weaknesses, it often requires an outside party to identify them for the person. However, it is then up to the person to examine the criticisms for motivation, veracity, and possible paths to improvement... this, in itself, is reflection.
Multiple people have commented on your forum demeanour marks, at times (more often than not) I (and others) have done so with a snippy and condescending attitude. I see the error of my ways. However, the message is clear; there are aspects of your online personality that <b>need</b> work... and that work can only come from you.
The way I see it, you read into things too much, you are too serious, and you attempt to debate people that are very much above your weight class. Further, you cannot handle being wrong and do not admit it easily (if at all). To compound this, you are not reflective, you do not accept that it is you that has the problem, you do not accept that it is you that needs to change. It is self-destructive behaviour.
That "yeah right" above is indicative of all this.
It's not just that Psalter. She needs to get a life away from her puter, but she can't.
Perhaps that's the point, they don't need to really face real life while posting on the internet. Only problem is it catches up with you eventually.
Psalter wrote:Diaz, Kieran (savant) and I are sitting here and discussing online personalities and we (I) have decided that you are the ultimate in online debating and rational thought (he says there is one other).
relict wrote:Somebody linked to a cartoon the other day about facebook types, including those who use avatars of their baby. It had a good point.
I also don't get why someone would use a name for themselves like ___(partner)__'s love. It's like saying your personal worth depends on them.
So narkslovenz, in that sense, might be an improvement.
markslovenz, if you are reading this, I mean no offense.
Waireka wrote:My FB profile pic is my baby
Waireka wrote:so is my Sig here.
relict wrote:Waireka wrote:My FB profile pic is my baby
Really?Waireka wrote:so is my Sig here.
Yes, but you avatar isn't. Not the same thing.
Waireka wrote:relict wrote:Waireka wrote:My FB profile pic is my baby
Really?Waireka wrote:so is my Sig here.
Yes, but you avatar isn't. Not the same thing.
Was. But I began to miss myself last night.