Creationist takes on Dawkins

Blank

Blank

Diaz wrote:

I'm more interested in the "lying for christ" angle. How can you claim censorship when you've censored the critical chapters out of the book you are claiming repression for and lie about the rest in the "introduction" you've written?

Back when I was a schoolgirl (long ago) Ray Comfort had a leather gear shop at New Brighton. He was a drug fucked hippie before he found Jesus (he would say Jesus found him). I suspect that Jesus (not you Ben!) came too late and Ray had already destroyed most of his living brain tissue. I'm surprised he could write at all.

Wizz wrote:

Diaz wrote:

I'm more interested in the "lying for christ" angle. How can you claim censorship when you've censored the critical chapters out of the book you are claiming repression for and lie about the rest in the "introduction" you've written?

Back when I was a schoolgirl (long ago) Ray Comfort had a leather gear shop at New Brighton. He was a drug fucked hippie before he found Jesus (he would say Jesus found him). I suspect that Jesus (not you Ben!) came too late and Ray had already destroyed most of his living brain tissue. I'm surprised he could write at all.

I don't think he can. It appears that all he can do is remove various chapters of someone else's book and add a 50 page ramble about some imaginary entity as the founder of existence. Sounds pretty drug fucked to me.