Isn't it having a Fonterra logo avatar and Fonterra website on a profile against Slime City rules, something to do with advertising and if it is so, would anyone be able to write a nice letter of complain to SC admin?
4 posters
Fonterra
83T'na- Nymph
- Post n°2
Re: Fonterra
canterella wrote:Isn't it having a Fonterra logo avatar and Fonterra website on a profile against Slime City rules, something to do with advertising and if it is so, would anyone be able to write a nice letter of complain to SC admin?
SSB is a shareholder in Fonterra (as a dairy farmer) so might well be entitled to use it.
If you're really concerned, contact SC Admin or Fonterra themselves.
canterella- Nymph
- Post n°3
Re: Fonterra
I did.
So you say that he's entitled to use it because he's a shareholder BUT then any owner of a small or a big business or a shareholder in a company can use a company logo in their avatar and community profile and it would not be deemed as free advertising?
It will be interesting to see what admin has as an answer to that.
I remember recently a member advertising V energy drink, he got silenced pretty quickly.
So you say that he's entitled to use it because he's a shareholder BUT then any owner of a small or a big business or a shareholder in a company can use a company logo in their avatar and community profile and it would not be deemed as free advertising?
It will be interesting to see what admin has as an answer to that.
I remember recently a member advertising V energy drink, he got silenced pretty quickly.
83T'na- Nymph
- Post n°4
Re: Fonterra
canterella wrote:I did.
So you say that he's entitled to use it because he's a shareholder BUT then any owner of a small or a big business or a shareholder in a company can use a company logo in their avatar and community profile and it would not be deemed as free advertising?
It will be interesting to see what admin has as an answer to that.
I remember recently a member advertising V energy drink, he got silenced pretty quickly.
Fair enough then.
____- Nymph
- Post n°7
Re: Fonterra
canterella wrote:I did.
So you say that he's entitled to use it because he's a shareholder BUT then any owner of a small or a big business or a shareholder in a company can use a company logo in their avatar and community profile and it would not be deemed as free advertising?
It will be interesting to see what admin has as an answer to that.
I remember recently a member advertising V energy drink, he got silenced pretty quickly.
That guy got silenced because they were a trolling moron.
canterella- Nymph
- Post n°8
Re: Fonterra
____ wrote:canterella wrote:I did.
So you say that he's entitled to use it because he's a shareholder BUT then any owner of a small or a big business or a shareholder in a company can use a company logo in their avatar and community profile and it would not be deemed as free advertising?
It will be interesting to see what admin has as an answer to that.
I remember recently a member advertising V energy drink, he got silenced pretty quickly.
That guy got silenced because they were a trolling moron.
Exactly. No difference there between those two, except in the level of literacy, perhaps.