Is Bardan that dude from TV this morning?

ie, the Act supporter who was denying the point of Earth Hour?

Yes he is.

Oh wow... I really think he is.

The exact same style of "debate" as well.

"Ok so you've conceded that symbolically it's rubbish"
"Uh what? I said symbolically it's good"

They said "symbolically" too much.

Definitely got owned by driver and has a long way to go in regards to dealing with media.....but I suspect many of us would get done in during a TV interview, a very humbling experience and one to learn a lot from.

woody67 wrote:Definitely got owned by driver and has a long way to go in regards to dealing with media.....but I suspect many of us would get done in during a TV interview, a very humbling experience and one to learn a lot from.

I don't know, I like to think I know enough not to lie about what the interviewer has said, make ridiculously flawed arguments, and then finish off the interview with a 3rd grade "not" joke.

bullseye wrote:Well, he hasn't done the Act party a lot of good - which can only be good for the rest of us.

No member has done them a lot of good (Rodney, Roger, Heather...), I'll be glad to see their back at the next election.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/I-think-my-argument-is-so-powerful-that-its-not-necessary-to-talk-about-it/110023352357827?v=wall&ref=nf#!/pages/I-think-my-argument-is-so-powerful-that-its-not-necessary-to-talk-about-it/110023352357827?v=wall&ref=nf


Hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahhaaha

____ wrote:https://www.facebook.com/pages/I-think-my-argument-is-so-powerful-that-its-not-necessary-to-talk-about-it/110023352357827?v=wall&ref=nf#!/pages/I-think-my-argument-is-so-powerful-that-its-not-necessary-to-talk-about-it/110023352357827?v=wall&ref=nf

double facepalm for that. Will he ever stop?